|
|
"Good ends never justify the deception of women or the destruction
of their children."
David C. Reardon, Ph.D Director of Elliott Institute |
 |
|
Source: Pro-Life Infonet; February
10, 2003
Pro-Life Groups File
Brief in Florida Informed Consent Case
Tallahassee, FL --
Today the Catholic Medical Association and the Christian Medical Associations
filed a brief in defense of a Florida law which requires that women have the
right to know about the consequences of undergoing an abortion. Together, the
two associations represent over 20,000 physicians. Last year, a state trial
court judge ruled that the informed consent law violates Florida's right to
privacy contained in the state constitution. The case of Presidential Women's
Center v. State of Florida is now pending before the Fourth District Court of
Appeal in Palm Beach County, Florida. The Associations are represented by Teresa
Collett, professor of law at South Texas College of Law, along with Mathew D.
Staver, President and General Counsel of Liberty Counsel.
The brief first
argues that the abortion clinic and its doctors have no standing to challenge
the law, because their position as medical providers is in direct conflict with
the rights of women considering an abortion. The abortion providers have an
obvious profit motive. It is not in their best interest to inform women of the
consequences of abortion. The interest of the abortion providers is not the
interest of women who have the right to know about the procedure.
The
brief also argues that women make better choices when they are fully informed of
the consequences and, like any other medical procedure, women simply have the
right to be fully informed. The brief criticizes the trial judge who struck down
the law, stating: "The order of the trial court reflects a failure to
recognize that a right exercised in ignorance is not freedom. It's just tyranny
once removed."
Staver commented, "Abortion providers arguing that
they should not be required to inform women about the consequences of abortion
is akin to the fox guarding the hen house. Abortion doctors have an incentive to
spend as little time with their patients as possible in order to increase their
profit margin. Although abortion providers claim they act in the best interest
of women, their actions are to the contrary. The best interest of women, and for
that matter the best interest of any patient, is to be fully informed of the
impending medical procedure. Women have a right to be fully
informed."

|
| More articles on Woman's Right to Know:

|
| Help support Hawaii Right to Life today! |
 |
|